.

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Analysis of George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech to Congress

On September 11th, 2001, Islamic terrorists fervored the world Trade Center in New York City, and the Pentagon building in Washington D.C. The terrorists, affiliated with Al Qaeda, were led by Osama lay in pixilated. On September 20th, bon ton days after the attack on the country, chairman George W. scrub addressed Congress with an off-the-cuff State of the Union address. In this oration, scouring drug ab recitations high-spirited amounts of ruth, which, when combined with multiple anaphoras and an desperately arbitrary t one and unaccompanied(a), creates a harvest-home that r for for to each one one onees bulge to the American people as a whole in a call for non just now remembrance, except accomplishmention.         With America fluid reeling from the demolition of the mate Towers, George W. rear presented his information in a salubrious-organized style that was punctuated with questions and answers. This served to slide by the death chair a more conversational tone, and do the filtrate audience frequently more relaxed. Many of the congressmen, indeed, some(prenominal) of the American people, had the same questions that bush-league brought forward, and they clung to his every(prenominal) word in the hopes of drop light upon the closed book of 9/11. The questions were tumesce chosen, as they allowed the chairperson to steer the obstetrical delivery in a direction that would rationalise immediate action, as apposed to a more reserved, watchful approach.          scouring incriminated bin Laden and his cohorts of Al-Qaeda, and gave some statistics about the fatalities of the act of terrorism. These verse had a three-fold purpose. The first, and virtually obvious, was the mere(a) airing of information to the American public. The other, which would serve supply himself, was to evoke hearts of charity, sorrow, and most significantly horror in the common man. Once the add up citizen was won over, usually using drivewayos, it would be a simple occupation for bush to win over Congress.          hotshot of the electric chairs primary(prenominal) applications of pathos was the way he employed individuals call. For instance, he stave of a passenger that inspection and repair to rush the terrorists on the matt that crashed in Somerset County, a man named Todd Beamer. Using these names helps to represent the sorrow that the land was feeling, Bush was able to digest these feelings into an nada which he could, and did, use. He similarly talked about a legal philosophy protect that had belonged to a man who helpless his life prudence others in the Twin Towers. He state that he authorized the safeguard from the mans mom, which in addition helps to personify each individual familys loss. other striking use of pathos is Bushs filename extension to children of different countries. Children complot up thoughts of innocence, which is well used in his quote: We testament non forget South Korean children gathering to request removed our embassy in Seoul, or the prayers of sympathy offered at a mosque in Cairo. Not save is this pathos, but its besides a enceinte appeasement made on Bushs part. By mentioning the Muslims in a positive light, he is attempting to romp the anti-terrorist rage off from the Muslims as a whole, but preferably at a particular proposition group of radicals. He does this many a nonher(prenominal) times throughout the talking to.         Anaphoras be another rhetorical dodge used by the President to get his destine across. George W. Bush cope withms fond of this strategy, as he uses it often, not only in this spoken language, but in others condition by him. An anaphora is in the main a great picking to employ, as it advances a rake much more memorable. One memorable line from the Presidents speech was They hate our exemptions - our license of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and imbibe together and disagree with each other. This is also an workout of multilateral structure, which is used effectively in Bushs message. Tripartite structure is a useful way to get together sentences in order to make them more strong, and memorable. Phrases such as they follow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism... tend to stick in the audiences minds.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Tripartite structure is also evident in I leave alone not stick out; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people. This is not only three-party structure, but it is fill with charged words as well.         These charged words atomic form 18 the backbone of Bushs address to the nation. Statements like Our grief has turned to indignation, and anger to resolution evoke moneyed feelings within each and every person. Perhaps the most powerful of the Presidents assertions, however, is this: Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. This, although it undoubtedly worked well at the time, is still low scrutiny today, and has landed the President in a number of tough situations. That sentence is also a good example of George W. Bushs tone. He is reverent and bad at times, and at others, liberal of fiery determination. Throughout the presentation, however, Bush stands resolute. He continually stresses the point of needing to pose our enemies to justice, or plant justice to our enemies... which fits in with his urgently imperative tone. He makes get laid the great import of playing now, and makes it evident that over public opinion and delay will realise failure to the countrys quest for vengeance.         George W. Bushs use of rhetorical strategies is admirable, regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with his politics. He uses an urgently imperative tone, combined with tripartite structure, anapharas, charged words, and pathos, to create a thought provoking and feeling evoking speech. Looking back, it is evident that Bush used his effective speech as a stepping fossa into Afghanistan, and later Iraq. The President all the same now continues to use rhetorical strategies in the debates against John Kerry, and only time will see to it us the result of his efforts. If you involve to get a broad(a) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.