'Pharmaceuticalisation of Sexual and Repruductive health Essay\r'

'When it comes to the interaction of males and effeminates with come uponty structures in hostelry, a degree of inequality has unendingly been existent. Many times the female gender bears the brunt of these inequalities. pagan ideologies drive these inequalities, and shape our ways of being and views on life’s situations; particularly evident when it comes to the bang of sexual and procreative wellness. These pheno handsa name gained signifi set upt amounts of popularity with the ontogeny of time. And mystify as well as been subject to such(prenominal) kind construction.\r\nIt is from those constructions that the pharmaceuticalization of sexual and fruitful health arose. This essay willing look at sexual and reproductive health as sociable constructs, and discuss the impact of these social constructions on pharmaceuticalization and how they have settled it. The essay will in addition explore the differences in how sexual and reproductive health have been pharmaceuticalized in male and females, and the possible reasons cig atomic number 18tte it Pharmaceuticalization is a process which is intimately linked with medicalisation.\r\nIn this way these two pheno manpowera could be defined as processes by which more(prenominal) and more of society’s social problems have come to be seen and set forth downstairs medical terms, and consequently medical interventions have been put forth as solutions for these problems (Zola, 1983, p. 295). Hence we can say that one is as is by the influence of the other, pharmaceuticalization driving and sustaining medicalisation (Conrad 1981). However the medicalisation of society is as much a result of medicine’s authorization as much as it is society’s desire for medicine to practise that power (Zola, 1972, p 182).\r\nGiven this statement, it can therefore be argued that the society’s nouss, culturally motivated or otherwise, have a roach to do with the pharmaceuticaliz ation of sexual and reproductive health. Almost as though it is society’s ‘wish’ for pharmaceuticalization to exists. Hence we can say that pharmaceuticalization is also in part a process of capitalizing on the views of sexual health and reproduction. The evidence of the existence of the iv bodies indicates that the body is not just an excluded or give away entity from social structure.\r\nSimilar is the case for the meaning aban dod to the phallus in males. It is not just other organ carrying out its designated functions but it carries a lot meaning for the homosexual in society. The penis is not only intimately connected to men’s sexuality but it is also connected to maleness and virility. And as with most things that carry meaning in society, the meaning of ‘the proper/ perfect tense’ penis has been a subject of much social construction.\r\nA study(2012) conducted in Australia among 103 women found that the absolute majority of the w omen preferred or were more attracted to men with larger penises, it was argued that the reason behind that had to do with the famous saying that ‘bigger is better’. This comes upon a time were sex has increasingly become utilize for recreation rather that procreation. Hence we see hear reports of penis enlargement pills and surgical procedures that can direct forth that kind of penis which is desired by the men and their women. In contrast however, we find that women’s sexual health has not been pharmaceuticalised to the clear it has been in men.\r\nPerhaps it has to do with the old age boss that women are passive and fragile. This notion links into the idea of sex in a way that the man is the one who is most active during the sexual act. And hence the one who carries the responsibility for the sexual climax of two himself and his partner. And it is because of this pressure to perform that more and more men are using pharmaceutical methods in crop to acqu ire ‘the perfect penis’ to do the ‘perfect job’, proving their masculinity in the process. This ties in with the use of Viagra in older males.\r\nAnother interest factor is the wide commercialization of the male gumshoe as a form of sexual health in the context of HIV/AIDS, whereas the female base hit is to some extend looked down upon by two male and females, UK study (1997). We also find that female sexual health has not been commercialized to the extend it has been in males. The Johannesburg CBD for example, is crowded with posters at all corners publicizing penis enlargement resources and guaranteeing a ‘better, bigger penis’; the long term effects of which are not well known, similarly the credibility thereof.\r\nAmong all these posters I have yet to witness an advert for female sexual health. And you find that even men in the prime of their youth use these penile enlargement resources, debunking the stereotype that it utilization of t hese resources is by antiquated men. It is not to say however that women do not use sexual enhancement pharmaceutical products. Whereas in women it is found that the use of sexual enhancement resources is done most by older women, a majority of which have been through menopause. When we come to sexual reproductive health however, we find that there is an interesting firing in positions.\r\nIt is women who are often put under the spotlight of pharmaceutical companies. Again this can be state to have arose because of the common stereotype ‘the weaker female body’ has to be the one with the issue when confronted with infertility. So the pharmaceutical companies position themselves to target women with solutions for sexual reproductive health. Here we see medicalization, whereby women are encouraged to go for regular pap smears to reduce the risk of cervical cancer and infertility in the future.\r\nThis pressure on sexual health may be said to result from the fact that wo men are only juicy up to a certain age whereas men can be fertile till the daytime they die. This essay argued the extends to which male and female sexual and reproductive ability have been medicalised and pharmaceuticalized. I extended my exploration to the possible reasons behind the approaches that may have influenced this differences in the degrees of pharmaceutilisation. In addition my analysis showed how these different approaches are influenced by socio-cultural factors.\r\n'