Lao-Tzu, Machiavelli, and the American Government

Lao-Tzus Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching and Machiavellis The Qualities of a Prince both(prenominal) have the ultimate purpose of making better attractors. The tactics that each writer chooses to present as a guide for the leader atomic number 18 about opposite of each otherwise. Todays American swayance would benefit from a combination of the twain extreme thinkings. Lao-Tzus laissez-faire military strength towards the economy, as fountainhead as his sm each scale, menage defense army is appealing to a liberal person.Machiavellis attitude towards miserliness and subvert taxes, charm being always vigilant for war, would appeal to a conservative person. The writers are in agreement on whatever issues, such as taxes, but other ideas, such as regime involution in the everyday lives of citizens are solely opposed to one a nonher. Lao-Tzu believes in reliever and small government. He states that a leader should stay within his country and govern his people only. Lao-tz u and Machiavelli are political philosophers composition in devil divers(prenominal) lands and two different times.Lao-tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher from sixth century BC, the author of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 geezerhood after Lao-tzus time, author of Prince. They are both philosophers but have only different perspective on how to be a good leader. While both philosophers create verbally is instructive. Lao-tzus advice issues from detached view of a popular ruler Machiavellis advice is very personal possibly demanding.Both philosophers idea will not work for todays world, because that modern world is not as perfect as Lao-tzu exposit in Tao-te Ching, and not as higgledy-piggledy as Machiavelli illustrated in Prince. In analyze and contrasting the governmental philosophies of the ample thinkers Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli, I have found a kind mix of both of their ideas would be the topper for America today. Lao-Tzus la isse-faire attitude towards the economy, as well as his small scale military is appealing to my liberal side, while Machiavellis attitude towards miserliness which causes low taxes appeals to the right wing.These great thinkers contradict the popular saying all great thinkers think alike. They have several(prenominal) ideas, such as taxes, that are the same, while other ideas, like the involvement of government in citizens everyday lives are totally opposite. I shall start with the ideas of Machiavelli, then rifle on to Lao-Tzus, and finally a likeness and application into American life. Niccolo Machiavelli believes in a reinforced government. The leader should be strong and feared. I believe he gets this idea from the fear of God.