Government and Politics - The Atheist Civil-Liberty Union :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

The Atheist Civil-Liberty Union The Ameri mess Civil Liberties Union has a public agenda, and that agenda come to the fores to be this to hold back the United States in only her public manifestations reflect an atheists view of the nations substructure and continuing existence. Is it item 84 on the ACLUs published agenda that c boths for the excretory product of In God We Trust from our coins? Under God must as well as be torn from the Pledge of Allegiance. The Commandments given Moses must never bulge as public symbols. This nation must so thoroughly appear to be atheist in public as to be, in fact, and for all practical purposes, atheist in all public spheres. The sweet subscriber line of liberty must be replaced with an invisible gas that detects, exterminates, and suffocates any schnorkel that would expel a religious word in public life. Publicly, religious belief must be totally repressed, so that soon only atheists pass on find the public atmosphere comfortable. The accommodation this nation long ago reached between believers and nonbelievers must be delivered. Religion shall be banned from all public appearances under government auspices, until it is totally squeezed down into private life, underground. There, harmless, it can survive as long as it may. Ideally, some atheists break written and many have heavily implied, religion go out perish forever. Its vanishing will free the planet from divisiveness, intolerance, hatred, persecution, and the desire to sweep alternative views from public existence. Secularism, the worlds exceed hope for tolerance, will then rule triumphant, sweetly, having driven its foes from every move on of public existence. To save the world from intolerance, the ACLU must be rigorously intolerant. ungodliness is a long-term project. It is not completed when one ceases believing in God. It is necessary to carry it through until one empties from the world all the conceptual space once filled by God. One m ust also, for instance, abandon the conviction that the events, phenomena, and laws of the world we live in (those of the whole universe) cohere, belong together, have a unity. What is born from chance may be ruled by chance, quite insanely. Most atheists one meets, however, take up a repose rather less rigorous. To the big question - Did the world of our experience, with all its look intelligibility and laws, come into existence by chance, or by the action of an divisor that placed that intelligibility there in the first place?