Fahrenheit 451 Analysis Essay

The theme of Ray Bradburys definitive Fahrenheit(postnominal) 451 kindle be viewed from several different angles. First and foremost, the hold in gives an anti-censorship message. Bradbury understood censorship to be a natural outcropping of an to a fault tolerant smart set. Yet, the protagonist Guy Montag is one of the few that is courageous adequacy to find out the truth for himself. This unexpected discovery on the corruptness of society challenged traditional values, knowledge and beliefs. The personal freedom to the right of an idiosyncratic having the freedom of expression when he utilizes the issue of censorship in Fahrenheit 451.In Bradburys novel, society has evolved to such an extreme that all belles-lettres is illegal to possess. Because of the trouble gives may cause, they were banned altogether. For font, one assemblage efficacy think they had a really great idea and wrote it in a book, however, the other group readiness object to something that has been wr itten, that means the book pass on have to be modified and therefore censorship begins. Soon, a nonher group objects to something else in the book, and it is again edited, eventually the original product will be lost.Because of this presented danger, no longer can books be read, not sole(prenominal) because they might offend someone, save because books raise questions for the mint that the government cannot answer. The intellectual thought process that comes from knowledge can often be dangerous, yet, who would want to do that when they can take the easy route? Ignorance is bliss applies perfectly here. The government would rather rule the peck orderly than have them start a transition with knowledge. This philosophy, according to the book, completely ignores the benefits of knowledge. True, knowledge can cause disharmony because it causes mess to ask why, still in mevery ways, knowledge of the aside, which is preserve in books, can prevent mankind from making similar mi stakes in the present and future.The society envisioned in Fahrenheit 451 is corrupted. As master Beatty explains, government control of peoples departs there was not a conspiracy of dictators, but a consensus of everyday people instead. The citizens ar so weak-minded that they preceptort want to think for themselves and solve the troubling problems of the world. They dont have very much emotion, because they prefer pleasure over hurt. The only way they can do this is to not c be. The parlor women, for example, cannot see past the surface. They are more interested in looks than reality they are so shallow that they cannot see ones true qualities. It is far easier to plump a lifetime of seclusion and a life where applied science will admit you with all necessities. Yet more importantly, Fahrenheit 451 described the people in that society as anti-social.Clarisse, the only normal girl mentioned that people in that society doesnt talk much, at all. They are either shouting or dancing around like wild (30), but the key point is, people dont talk close to anything (31), they name a lot of cars or clothes or limpid pools mostly and maintain how swell (31) They do not quite live in the reality, only using abstract things to entertain themselves. They all say the same things and nobody says anything different (31) because in their eyes, technology and the government is incessantly correct. This is very similar to our world today, almost everyone some kind of technology television, computer, hand held devices. When we have a choice between technology or nature. It is almost certain that technology wins. We are on the computer threesome to four hours a day, doing work, checking email, social media, or just simply surfriding the web. Our everyday life is technology we depend on it so much that it is almost impossible to live without it.People in the novel are afraid of themselves, of what their minds are capable of doing. They fear the thought of knowing, which leads them to depend on others, such as technology and the government to think for them. The best example would be the protagonist Guy Montag. His entire view on life shifted as the book progressed. He was originally a normal fireman, but when he met his neighbor Clarisse McClennen, who was considered a misfit in the society, he began to see things differently. quite of burning books because its useless information to the public, he now wants to dish out its knowledge with the whole world. Montag is at war with the society, hes battling against the joint knowledge and laws, trying to shine some light on the people.Thus, the book successfully advocates the idea that men should think for themselves, not let technology or any outside sources decide for them. Technology may provide you with joy, but to live life to the fullest, you have to try everything, and there are no substitute for the treasure you can find in books. Its like Montag said, I went around doing one thing and feeling another. (131) as he reflects on all the trouble that he has gotten into because he has not been true to himself. Although this path might not be easy, it is necessary for any society that doesnt wish to repeat the mistakes of the past to earn knowledge. Our society today needs to realize that before it is too late.