Redefinition of Authorship and Ownership in Media and Cultural Essay

Redefinition of Authorship and self-will in Media and Cultural Industries - Essay Examplereader gives the consumers a chance at obtaining the books not from the authors, still from the contraceptive pill maker through the publisher (Hesmondhalgh, 2012, p. 21). Not long ago, when the first marketable tablet came proscribed in the form of an iPad, the chief executive officer of Apple, Steve Jobs, convinced several(prenominal) publishers to market their books through this example of computer which he promised would revolutionize the reading industry. He was right to a large extent since tablet computers open since then taken over from books and the education sector in general. Other tablet makers, who majorly exist of the Android market, followed suit with their contracts with publishers. Other companies that specialized in publishing like Barnes and Noble, Kobo, and especially Amazon do a lot of contracts with publishers and specific authors to have their material sold through their platforms. The contracts between the authors, the publishers and the tablet makers atomic number 18 the focus of this piece. The contracts consisted of allowing the tablet makers to market the books from several publishers and owners in one place the tablet makers unanimously called a store so that consumers, instead of going to each individual publisher to get a presumption title, would only have to search for the same title in one place. The eBooks cost differently from their hardbound counterparts from this moment (Straubhaar, LaRose and Davenport, 2011, p. 78). While the hardcover copies were priced differently due to for example the contents of the book, the popularity among its readers or the effort spent in penning the given piece of work, the tablet and eBook reader makers sought to unify the prices of these books due to several reasons they gave among them the fact that the books had an almost similar value in their... This essay stresses that the main corporatio ns in informational technology include media houses that concern themselves with the dissemination of news or other issues around the world. Such houses include Bloomberg, News muckle and BBC among others. Others in this classification include film companies such as 20th Century Fox. Technological changes have seen a shift to most of the media houses being owned and controlled by either governing bodys or powerful families.This paper makes a conclusion that the corporations that ar owned by the governments in their countries of origin include the BBC and most media firms in China. The Chinese government controls most of the media content and has ownership rights to most of the media houses too. The BBC was founded and runs on funds from the taxpayers money. There are several reasons as to why a government can control or won a media house. Most reasons speckle to the issue so of costs which are deemed to be low due to the governments participation. The seeking of information by private individuals would be an expensive task to undertake. Other reasons point to the freedom of the press as a result of government dissemination of the information about the goings-on in the country since it is in control of most of the happenings. This is in contrast to private companies which would serve the governing classes interest. The sexual climax of technology has brought changes in this sector in reference to the types of information given out.